NaylaD's Blog

I guess its 'To each their own' when writing a review. I love seeing the in depth ones, it's a great way to build a mental picture, but, at the basics, it's a service, so the reviews might have to be in depth to get the message across. If they are too vague then it doesn't help either, as you don't get told what went right or wrong.

 

Why not review a punter? They could be drugged, violent, have other tendencies that at WL wouldn't want to deal with?

Well I suppose the review of the punter could be.........he was fat, hairy, bald, smelled of (body odour/tobacco/alcohol/bad breath) and was a dud root.

 

Might not be far of the mark some of the time eh?

 

But as for the reviews of the WL I think they can be written to describe the service and the description of the lady without going into blow by blow. 

 

Reading some of the more graphic reviews I can't help but think the reviewer has an ego bigger than Kevin Rudd.  Maybe if the WL was allowed to reply then she might say "you wish". 

 

So bottom line for me is I don't like the blow by blow graphic description but the more descriptive general ones and certainly the clever funny ones are a great read.  Some of the funny ones actually describe the WL a lot better because they show she has a sense of humour and can get around difficult situations.

 

Its all about the WL's service......did she provide the service she advertised and was it what you expected and if not, why not?.

 

Thank you Nayla.  Its no secret that I think you are the greatest thing since canned beer.

Non valid comparison the one about writing reviews about punters, as they don't get paid to provide a service, and actually pay for privacy among other aspects of the service. That's the purpose of a review, and we want to know what happens in a booking (except detailing something that you may offer and happens to be illegal due to some silly state law).

 

Be happy that you get reviews, because some escorts apparently want to have the cake and eat it too, which reeks of hypocrisy. So, if you don't want details in reviews, the honest thing would be to ask for no reviews at all from your clients. Because the way you put it sounds that you can do with the promotional aspect of them but you object about what we find useful in reviews. If you have a routine that makes your reviews sound all too similar (and I don't know if this is the case), ditch the routine and let the client take driver's seat. In the 21st century, reviews are part of an escort's job, whether she likes them or not, the same way they are part of any other paid service.

Firstly YMMV

Secondly this is exactly the reason why i changed my review style. If you see the first review i did of a PWL till the most recent you will see less intimate details. I Include a summary but the review is more about the experience not what happened and ticking boxes

 I love seeing the in depth ones, it's a great way to build a mental picture, 

 

I so agree with you ... Those pictures, are extremely h.o.t

 

But as for the reviews of the WL I think they can be written to describe the service and the description of the lady without going into blow by blow. 

 

That's the purpose of a review, and we want to know what happens in a booking (except detailing something that you may offer and happens to be illegal due to some silly state law).

 

I agree with you that those laws, are really silly uh?

How do you get the feeling from the lady about how far you can go on a review?

Firstly YMMV

Secondly this is exactly the reason why i changed my review style.

 

Agree, agree and agreed

I agree with you that those laws, are really silly uh?

How do you get the feeling from the lady about how far you can go on a review?

 

I don't get any feelings or feedback from the lady about what to write or not, unless she's worried about something specific and in that case she'll probably tell me without me asking (if she knows who I am, which is not always the case). Normally I use commonsense, basically, apart from any legal considerations, anything that goes beyond (but actually beyond) the advertised or promised service like more time, etc, I don't share with the public. But what it's part of the advertised service, I describe because there are different ways or degrees of offering those same things. And describing the overall experience, which is great, is not mutually exclusive with describing the service's details. In any case, I think that details are most useful when we don't know the reviewer all that much (eg, new members, very occasional reviewers, etc.), because when we don't know someone, it's pointless if that person tells us that the experience was mind-blowing or dreadful, because we don't know what mind-blowing or dreadful means for that person. He could have either low or unrealistic expectations respectively. So, in cases like those I honestly prefer a police report style of review, just descriptive and it would help me assess the experience with my own set of expectations. On the other hand, when we really know a reviewer, he can slack a fair bit about details and just by the rest, we'll complete the missing details in our minds by knowing his previous reviews and expectations.

So, in cases like those I honestly prefer a police report style of review, just descriptive and it would help me assess the experience with my own set of expectations.

 

Thank U very much AndyJ 

Interesting though that there is a WL in my part of the world who has  fairly comprehensive details of do's and don'ts on her website.

 

One of the points she makes is that if you have a problem with her service then she would rather hear about it from you than to read it first in a review.  She's not saying don't write a review but if you didn't like it then tell her first and discuss it.

 

It is highly unlikely that with this lady you would have a problem but a fair enough point all the same

It is difficult to find the right level for a review. At first I thought they were intrusive, but that was before I started using them to work out who to book. It was then that I took notice of those review I found useful. The superficial "she was great, but I'll keep the details to myself" were not. Ultimately, the audience is the punter and the information in the review is needed to make an informed choice. Of course, the details of a service will vary from one punter to the next, but that fact comes through from reading multiple reviews.

 

As Andy said, one must be careful not to reveal anything that is not strictly legal or a bonus that may create an expectation in a future punter the WL may not wish to provide to all, but that said, there needs to be enough detail to understand the style of the experience to expect.

 

If the WL doesn't want the details shared, that is fine, but that is best achieved by asking not to be reviewed at all.

A fellow punter asked me via PM for comments about a review he had written of a very special lady. I responded in the following way. Note that I have obscured some detail because it was a private conversation. Also because it was a private conversation no part of his question of follow-up comments are included.

 

* * *

 

Hi ABC

I have read your 1234 5679 a few times now and thoroughly enjoyed it. I wish I had your money

Ms 5679 figure from the photos makes her look like a genuine natural beauty, and when combined with your song of praise for her, it is a very powerful combination indeed.

I read the comments from the other clowns as well, and I was disappointed as usual. It's was the usual mix of bland “me too, me too” and some “I wish it was me as well” hand waving. For fucks sake guys, a respectful sensual guy is described his LOVING encounter with a very beautiful young lady and all you folks can find to say is “...yer I does wish I couldah hit dat too!.” Ugh!

Anyhoo – you asked for feedback so I'll do my best.

You and I have different styles, very different budgets and probably different personal needs. So I cannot “correct” your review. I don't see anything about your review that needs to be changed to be honest.

I will however describe some of the differences between your 5679 review and my more recent ones - as I see them. This is perhaps less about Ms 5679, and more about how you and I are different and need to target a different audience.

My reviews are part diary for my future self, and part advertising so a good girl gets the appreciation she needs and will hang around longer. I re-read my own reviews before a punt, and often decide on a revisit based on this re-reading process. I try to be honest and accurate in these notes to my future self. Also if I discovered that the lady needed some special handling to bring her “A-Game” this also tends to make it into the review for when I read it in the future.

I punt often and I have a budget of approx $---- per month. This budget needs to allow FS with a young slim lady ever week as a minimum. From time to time I get needy and will spend more and from time to time I will be busy, sick, or fucked in the head and will spend less.

The reason I mention this financial stuff is to point out that the folks I see will typically only charge $---- for thirty minutes.

Another risk is the ladies I write about typically work long hours, and will see folks back to back all through the day. If I rave and rave about mood, emotions, and sensitive shared moments, there is a very high chance I would probably be overselling the girl, and hardly anyone would get the same experience. Lose lose.

Despite the above, I do make the effort to talk about these sexual encounters in a gentle loving respectful way. Firstly because I am more of a GFE seeking punter. Secondly because not many others punting at these venues seem to be gentle and kind. Most just are out for an orgasm and the lady is a facilitator or object instead of a partner or accomplice.

[snip - personal stuff removed]

 

Cheers
Blakes7

I tend to write narrative style reviews probably because I am not a creative writer. I do consider what level of detail to include and it varies, I certainly have left some things out , something special that may have occurred between us. I try and convey the mood,the action  and if needed whether the WL was true to her advertising claims.

I usually conclude with how it made me feel. I think I look at both sides and do a fair job but thats for others to judge.

One of the points she makes is that if you have a problem with her service then she would rather hear about it from you than to read it first in a review. 

Naluram my dear, for me it is more than specifying about what she can improve or perform better

 

Or the do's and don'ts are related to the review?

If the WL doesn't want the details shared, that is fine, but that is best achieved by asking not to be reviewed at all.

 

Do you ask to the WL or you expect that this will be told to you?

My reviews are part diary for my future self, 

 

Another risk is the ladies I write about typically work long hours, and will see folks back to back all through the day. If... and hardly anyone would get the same experience. Lose lose.

 

 

That is such an interesting thing, you having a "punting diary", a 1st for me.

 

And yes, I agree that some ladies that work for long hours, might not perform equally in all bookings

 

Thank U

I think I look at both sides and do a fair job but thats for others to judge.

 

I think that is really fair enough

Do you ask to the WL or you expect that this will be told to you?

I have only seen three ladies to date and to the best of my knowledge, all embrace the concept of reviews. That said, prior to my last punt, the topic of a review was raised and I was asked not to write one, so I did not.

 

Also, in all three cases, the ladies knew I was a PP member so the possibility of a review would have been known. If I had any concern that a review may not be wanted, I would ask. If I was with someone who was unaware I was associated with a reviewing web site, I would ask or simply not write a review in the first place. There is also the option of the WL stating up front she doesn't want reviews without knowing up front whether her client intends to write one.

 

So, the direct answer to your question is "both". The 'you didn't ask/you didn't tell me' argument serves no one.

NaylaD, I agree we are all different (thank goodness) I could not and would

not want to duplicate another's experience but its good to know a little of what to expect. It's as important to me that the lady enjoys herself as much as me so owing what she likes is important. In a short time booking knowing up front save time. So some info up front is good. mind you some revues are a real turn on!!!!!! We shall have to read those ones together and help masturbate each other :-))))

As for reviewing the punter back? Again each to own. Us males are very sensitive especially about performance! I would not like to be compared to a 'stud' as I am sure I would rank badly but some feedback about something good or do something different would be nice ... Told sympathetically of course (eg lying in the arms of the lady while still inside her when she tells you she like being pounded so could you .. Pretty please :-) ....) Feedbacks good as it means she enjoys it more so you enjoy it more - it's really altruistic.

Good topic.

 We shall have to read those ones together and help masturbate each other 

 

Definately YEEEEESSSSS

The 'you didn't ask/you didn't tell me' argument serves no one.

 

 

 

uhu... yes, yes

 

A most interesting question you asked in your original comment Nayla. (My question is, how far can a review go without "intruding" the WLs? Or because we are WL's there is no bubble of intimacy for us?).

My personal preference are those reviews that describe the experience without being clinical. There are many ways to talk about a positive experience and not intrude on a WL's intimacy. For me it comes down to maintaining the level of respect for someone who has shared what is a close and sensual time with you. Many people will naturally gravitate to those who they enjoy being with and with whom they feel they have a warm rapport. I don't think a clinical review would support that rapport in any way. But this is just my view and I don't denigrate the opinion of anyone else at all.

 

And as far as reviewing punters, why not! I think it would be great to hear what the the WL's think of everyone. It know it would certainly benefit my experience if I found I was acting like a complete wanker. And I imagine there would be some highly interesting, illuminating, amusing and probably hilarious reviews that emerge across the spectrum.

 

Great question Nayla

And as far as reviewing punters, why not! I... And I imagine there would be some highly interesting, illuminating, amusing and probably hilarious reviews that emerge across the spectrum.

 

Certainly, I would love to read them (the hilarious ones)

 

My regular would probably write something like this.

 

Private – November 2013 – Blakes7

 

Blakes7 presents as a shy, pale and round individual that badly needs to hit the Gym. He is clearly grateful to be there with us and would best be described as “Mostly Harmless”. Despite his poor first impression he is very eager to please and it's a pleasure to fake an extra orgasm or two for him because, and lets face it ladies, his cunnilingus is poor, his kissing in lazy, and his willy is certainly no threat to anyone.

 

Overall, more funny than erotic, like a kitten wearing a jacket or something.

 

Blake7's regular.

XOXOXO