Age Verification

To access you must be 18+ years old. Our site is intended for a mature audience.

Jump to content

Flexi's Fact or Fiction

A blog by FlexiSexi in General

  • entries
    24
  • comments
    32
  • views
    11,772

Right of Reply to Spanish Jennifer Review

FlexiSexi

Entry posted by FlexiSexi

1,541 views

Return to Fact or Fiction Blog Index

 

Introduction

Another review of Jennifer of Westminster Secrets popped up recently which was at odds with my own. I don't mind people having a different perspective, in fact I welcome it, however the person who scratched out the other deplorable review accused mine of being fake, pretty poor form from a fellow punter I reckon. I didn't comment on his thread as we are told not to turn a review into an argument (and he is entitled to his opinion). Also I didn't want to bump it to the top again as IMHO it didn’t deserve it. However, I couldn't let it go by without a response so here are my thoughts.

 

BTW, I refuse to name the reviewer as that would be argumentative. Also, I'm disappointed the mods didn't moderate - I've seen less pitiful reviews censured.

 

How credible is the reviewer?

  • First ever review
  • Second post only on PP
  • Review placed in wrong folder until moved by a mod No template was filled in until completed by a mod
  • Heading was wrongly formatted
  • His opening line " It’s a bit of an effort to write an entertaining review ..." - perhaps PP punters aren’t worthy
  • Before accusing me of writing a fake review perhaps he could have checked that I’ve completed over 60 reviews on PP (over 100 with blog and hidden reviews)
  • Perhaps if he was going to rely on my review so absolutely he could have drilled in a little with a PM Hasn't been back since posting the review

Is the review itself credible?

  • The review has no balance
  • The review is excessively harsh as if he has the sole intention of bringing her down
  • The review is unreasonably personal, way beyond where most punters would tread - for example in regard to bodily imperfections such as a slightly inverted nipple, I personally don't go into such personal detail in an open forum review - all women have something that could be picked on - how many of we reviewers detail every little physical imperfection - I for one would say it is a rarity in the open forum
  • If she’s “37 to 43” years old then I’m 116
  • If she’s not pretty by most punters’ standards I’ll eat my condom
  • In spots it is inconsistent, for example, he said she is not curvy and has a figure “kind of like an uncurvy Asian girl” yet he says her size is 12 to 14
  • If her beasts are not at least a good c-cup I’ll hang up my keyboard
  • I’ve never seen an ugly “box” – I don’t think such a thing exists – in this case I can’t even imaging what point he's inexpertly and in-eloquently trying to make – my memory is a little hazy (it’s been months and many “boxes” have passed under the bridge) but I seem to recall it as being perfectly fine
  • I never had a single starfish minute with her in two visits and we spent ages with chests touching - I think he was making a joke about this but I just don't get it
  • Can’t comment on the massage – didn’t have one, didn't have time

The Reviewers Approach to the Punt

Getting into a heated debate about her ethnicity at the outset is not likely to encourage a giving performance and what's it matter if she's Spanish, Italian or Czechoslovakian her accent is very strong and very sexy Relying soley on a single review without following with a PM is always risky

 

Accusing My Review of Being Fake and Overly Positive

I mentioned her kissing style was of concern in two separate posts on my thread, maybe he missed that bit We spent a lot of timing kissing – it just wasn’t that good

I mentioned her BJ skill was limited, maybe he missed that bit

I mentioned her quirky/annoying streak, maybe he missed that bit – some people bothered to PM me to inquire further

 

Conclusion

I hope he feels better now after such a vindictive, vitriolic and pernicious review but I won’t be reading any future material by this individual of indeed he surfaces again. I’m not saying she is the best root in town but his review makes it sound like she's the worst and she’s not. Maybe this is the doing of a disgruntled competitor in disguise.

 

Fellow punters, please feel free to offer any thoughts on this thread, good or bad. Also if anyone has any further intelligence on Jennifer it would be welcome, good or bad.

 

BTW - I just checked and the reviewer has not returned to PP since posting her review.

6 Comments

Recommended Comments

Cherries🍒

Hi there flexi ,I want you to no that I feel the same way as you .This terrible review of Jennifer is totally wrong &just overboard.Yes every one sees differantly threw there eyes as we all have differant tast buds :-). Any way l feel your right and this could be some one else ??? Things are slow at the moment and when this happens , people get desperate and jealous of one another. I don't no if this has happend but feel strongly that it could be. This site is for info for better punting not for putting people down in such a horrible way. Maybe I'm setting myself up for disaster but who cares cos I can't sit back and read such bad review and say how I feel ....Cheers to you and thank you for being a great man xx cherry blossum

Link to comment
AndyJ

Hi Flexi,

 

Two things, the first one is that I simply missed the statement about the brothel writing the reviews of Jennifer (I skip-read normally due to time constrains and like any review without the template, that I added later, I spend more time doing that sort of thing. We trust that people would use the report button for objectionable content. I edited the statement now).

 

The other thing, and this is said now that you draw attention to the review, is that I would have thought he was just a newbie not knowing who you are, and there's also a positive review by John5000, so I don't know what review he's referring to. He's wrong either way as both are real punters; I just give him the benefit of the doubt that maybe it's a case of YMMV. I've seen reviews with really bad descriptions without meaning they are fake. Now, sometimes there could be foul play too but it often takes time to prove such thing, if we are able to do so at all. In cases like those we trust that the positive comments by established and credible punters such as you, overweight any negative comments made either falsely or without respect. Cheers.

Link to comment
FlexiSexi

Hi there flexi ,I want you to no that I feel the same way as you .This terrible review of Jennifer is totally wrong &just overboard.Yes every one sees differantly threw there eyes as we all have differant tast buds :-). Any way l feel your right and this could be some one else ??? Things are slow at the moment and when this happens , people get desperate and jealous of one another. I don't no if this has happend but feel strongly that it could be. This site is for info for better punting not for putting people down in such a horrible way. Maybe I'm setting myself up for disaster but who cares cos I can't sit back and read such bad review and say how I feel ....Cheers to you and thank you for being a great man xx cherry blossum

 

Cherry Blossum - thanks for your remarks - I think the reviewer was basically a nasty person. They obviously didn't click and he sought his revenge in a vicious review.

Link to comment
FlexiSexi

Hi Flexi,

 

Two things, the first one is that I simply missed the statement about the brothel writing the reviews of Jennifer (I skip-read normally due to time constrains and like any review without the template, that I added later, I spend more time doing that sort of thing. We trust that people would use the report button for objectionable content. I edited the statement now).

 

The other thing, and this is said now that you draw attention to the review, is that I would have thought he was just a newbie not knowing who you are, and there's also a positive review by John5000, so I don't know what review he's referring to. He's wrong either way as both are real punters; I just give him the benefit of the doubt that maybe it's a case of YMMV. I've seen reviews with really bad descriptions without meaning they are fake. Now, sometimes there could be foul play too but it often takes time to prove such thing, if we are able to do so at all. In cases like those we trust that the positive comments by established and credible punters such as you, overweight any negative comments made either falsely or without respect. Cheers.

 

Andy, thanks for taking the time to respond and for removing the offensive remarks. TBH I'd missed the John5000 review and checking it now, I'd probably not see Jennifer on the strength of it. Also I should have, in hindsight, pressed the report button but again I simply never thought of it. There was something about the way this reviewer reviewed that made me see red. Thanks again and cheers.

Link to comment
Clandestine

You just dont know what motive there is behind that review Flexi. I'll go with established experience on here everytime.

Link to comment
×
×
  • Create New...